Skip to content

Economy & moneyEpisode 307Line0:55

India vs Pakistan GDP per person, 2000 to 2025

Yearly output per person, in US dollars. World average: $5,513 (2000) and $14,406 (2025).

Guess the number before you watch

Guess the number

Guess the number: India vs the world average, 2025

50%
0%100%
0:00 / 0:55

Source: World Bank (2025 data) · November 2026

The numbersFills in as the clip plays
  1. 1India2,702.5
  2. 2Pakistan1,595.9

Narration

Follows the clip · tap a line to jump

Runs 0:55.

How to read this chart: Follow the path: slope is the rate of change and height at any point is the value. More on line charts.

The takeaway

India overtook Pakistan for good in 2009. Against the world average, India rose from 8% to 19% while Pakistan stayed near 11%.

The data

Explore the numbers

1,0002,0002000200420082012201620202025India 2,702.5Pakistan 1,595.9

Point at the chart, or focus it and use the arrow keys, to read each value.

Show
Period
India
2000: 442.8 → 2025: 2,702.5 (+510%)
High 2,702.5 (2025) · Low 442.8 (2000)
Pakistan
2000: 642.3 → 2025: 1,595.9 (+148%)
High 1,595.9 (2025) · Low 599.9 (2002)

Source: World Bank (2025 data). As of November 2026.

Explore this chart

The chart from the video, redrawn live from its data. Scrub to any moment, or play it again.

What the numbers show

In 2000, the average Pakistani produced more than the average Indian: about $642 a year against $443, according to the World Bank. These figures are GDP per person: the value of everything a country produces in a year, divided by its population, in current US dollars. They are not what a typical household earns, but they are the most widely used single measure of how much an economy produces for each of its people.

Both were far below the world average, which the World Bank puts at about $5,513 per person in 2000. Measured against it, Pakistan was at about 12 percent and India at about 8 percent. India then closed the gap. It moved ahead briefly in 2007, Pakistan led again in 2008, and from 2009 India stayed in front every year to 2025.

By 2025 the World Bank puts India at about $2,703 per person and Pakistan at about $1,596, against a world average of about $14,406. That is about 19 percent of the world average for India, up from 8 percent in 2000, and about 11 percent for Pakistan, slightly down from 12 percent.

In other words, India grew much faster than the world as a whole, while Pakistan grew a little slower. The gap did not move evenly: Pakistan's figure fell in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2019, 2020 and 2023, while India's dipped only in 2008, 2012 and 2020. Part of every move is the exchange rate. The series converts each year's output into US dollars at that year's rate, so a weaker currency lowers the figure even in a year when the economy grows.

These are the World Bank's figures as of November 2026, from its World Development Indicators, last updated in October 2026. The two lines on the chart are that one series for India and Pakistan, read directly from the World Bank's data service; the world average is the same indicator's "World" figure. The 2025 values are the newest in the series and may still be revised. India has far more people than Pakistan, so this compares output per person, not the size of the two economies.

Keep going

Numbers of the week, in your inbox

One email every Monday: last week’s clips, the number behind each, and what’s coming next. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Transcript

  1. In 2000, each Pakistani produced 642 dollars of goods and services a year. Each Indian, 443.

  2. The world average was about 5,500 dollars. So India was at 8 percent of it, and Pakistan at 12. India closed the gap, and in 2009 pulled ahead for good. As of November 2026, the 2025 figures put India at — 19 percent of the world average. Pakistan slipped to 11. In dollars, that is about 2,700 for India and 1,600 for Pakistan, against a world average near 14,400. India has grown much faster than the world. Pakistan, a little slower.

  3. Which country should India face next? Comment your answer. Like it, share it, and follow for the next head to head.

Source & method

Economy & money